How do we define a being—in
particular, a human being? Of course, we could defer to biology for a
definition of a living entity, which describes it as possessing certain
characteristics; or to the dictionary, which defines a being as “the
nature or essence of a person.” Now, that definition is a bit of an
anthropocentric perspective, since it could be argued that a dog or a
bat is also a being, and that they have their own essence.
But
sticking with the human arena for the moment, there is widespread
acceptance that we Homo
sapiens
are a tripartite entity which consists of a body, a mind, and a soul.
It's the union of these three qualities that makes me, me. Each of us
is a unique human being, whose body, mind, and soul comprise who we
are, and the combination makes each one of us distinct.
Not everyone agrees with this
perspective, however. Some would argue that there is no such thing as
the soul—that each of us is really a bipartite being. To
take a closer look, let me consider the nature of each of these three
components of a human being—starting with the least controversial
one: the body.
The body is the only one of the three
that is a material entity. All of our senses—sight, hearing, smell,
touch, taste—will confirm that indeed we have a body. It can be
seen, heard, smelled, touched, and tasted. I can use any one—or
all—of my senses to convince me that the body is real. There's
little disagreement that our corporeal essence exists.
How
about the mind? Although none of our senses can unequivocally prove
it, each of us is quite certain that we do
have a mind. It may be immaterial, but common sense and experience
tell us that our mind is real—just as real as the body. In fact,
Rene Descartes, some 400 years ago, reasoned that our mind is the
only
real thing about our being that we can be sure of. In a deeply
skeptical analysis, he concluded that, although we might be deluded
about our body, we can be sure
that we are thinking, and thus we exist—even if the only real
aspect of us is our mind.
Descartes'
thinking aside, how do we know
that we have a mind, if we cannot see it or touch it? Many historical
arguments and scientific experiments offer us evidence of its
reality, yet it remains a diaphanous thing. Is it measurable? Can it
be proven? Most of us are convinced we do
have a mind—an aspect of us that enables us to be aware, to have
experiences, to think (Descartes' point), and to feel. It's the basic
faculty of our consciousness.
Modern
science has provided lots of evidence for the existence of the
mind—through various technologies of brain scans. In fact, the body
and mind are intimately connected. Yet many questions remain. How
does an immaterial entity like the mind influence, or even direct,
the material body? Where does the mind reside—in the brain?
Throughout the body? Or even outside
the body? Can the mind survive the body's death? Might it be possible
some day to upload the mind into a computer and thus achieve some
kind of immortality?
More
tripartite tenets next time...
No comments:
Post a Comment