Wednesday, July 6, 2016
Cecil's Snake
Cecil the cat has a propensity to go after snakes. He cornered a black snake (not venomous) a couple of days ago. The snake was not amused. The cat wisely backed down. (Click to enlarge.)
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Silence Stimulates
I
live in a very rural area, that experiences minimal traffic noise or
other urban disturbances. In fact, many friends consider it to be the
far-out boonies. I need the tranquility. Over the last few decades
researchers have documented many ill effects that society's noise has
on people. Epidemiologists have shown a high correlation between
noise and high blood pressure, heart disease, sleep loss, and immune
system damage. Five years ago the UN's World Health Organization
found that some 340 million Europeans (a bit more than the population
of the US) annually lose over a million years of healthy life, due to
noise. That's one hell of a toll!
Noise
pollution has been recognized for a couple of generations as having a
deleterious impact on human health and well being. As a person who
built a career on studying the mechanics of noise reduction, I'm not
at all surprised at the negative impact of noise on people. It's what
my career was all about! It's also a major reason why I took leave of
the urban life three decades ago and sought refuge and a healthier
(and quieter) life in the woods of Appalachia.
I
sought solace in the quiet I found out here. I avoid noisy
machines—rototillers, tractors, and other small engine devices—in
favor of doing as much by hand as possible. It is not only cheaper
and more peaceful, but gives my body the exercise that it needs.
I
have written before on this blog about my desire for tranquility and
solitude. In quiet moments I seek calmness, I tune into inner
thoughts, I can even come to sense the oneness of existence. I have
found quiet to be soothing and healing—especially knowing that
noise is unhealthy. The root of the word noise is the Latin word
nausea, meaning “seasickness.” (The Latin word naus
means “ship.”)
But
that reasoning suggests that quiet (or silence) is primarily an
escape from something. It's replacing a “thing” with “no
thing.” Quiet, in this sense, is just an absence of noise; silence
is just the lack of sound. Is silence really just a negative entity?
The
key here is what's going on in the brain—our ultimate sensory
response either to noise or quietness. The science of brain scans has
exploded in recent years and is providing lots of evidence of what's
going on in the brain, as it responds to various sensory inputs. Some
recent research is showing that activity in the brain is stimulated
by silence, just as much as when we hear sounds. A certain network of
neurons lights up when sounds are heard, but quite a different set of
neurons fires when quiet ensues. So the brain is just as active when
quiet prevails. To the brain, silence is not a negative entity.
Mental work is happening then too.
These
recent findings fuel my need for quiet even more. Where silence once
represented an escape from a clamorous world for me, I have come to
see that it's not an escape from, but a coming to
something: a state wherein my brain stays engaged—but no longer in
an unpleasant way. It's now active in an agreeable and even creative
way. In fact, it's doing the healthy work of silence. As Paul Simon
wrote over 50 years ago,
And
the vision that was planted in my brain
Still
remains
Within
the sound of silence.
Labels:
noise,
noise pollution,
silence,
unhealthy noise
Sunday, June 26, 2016
Spring Beauties
I have posted photos of these wildflowers before, but I can't help myself from doing it again. Of all the cultivated flowers I have coddled over the years, wild spring beauties seem to outdo them all. These little blossoms (about one-half inch or one centimeter wide) shine forth in all their glory for two months. And if I care for them, they will return next spring and bless me for many more weeks. What can one ask for more, in a flower? (Click to enlarge.)
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Our Haitian Obligation
I
recently discovered a fascinating historical tidbit, from one of my
online courses: the US owes a great debt to Haiti, for what its
people did to stand up to Napoleon's superior forces in 1803. Here's
how it came about.
After
the USA won its war of independence from Britain (some 20 years
earlier), the Americans were no longer confined to the East Coast.
They began to expand westward across the Appalachian Mountains, into
Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Rich farmland awaited them in these
new territories. Their challenge was to get their agricultural
products back to the newly independent states along the coast. The
mountains were too formidable a barrier to carry all that produce
over them and there were no roads. The solution was to float the
goods down the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers to New Orleans, load it on
ships and sail back up the coast to the original 13 states. This
route depended on the agreeableness of Spain, who controlled New
Orleans at the time. Spain was agreeable. The US prospered.
Another,
much greater barrier than the Appalachians, however, loomed in the
mind of Napoleon Bonaparte, who was feeling his military oats in
Europe at the time. He was smarting from the revolt of Haitian
slaves, who in the 1790s had booted out the French and had been
governing themselves quite well, thank you. Haiti and the other
Caribbean islands were very prosperous at the time, from their sugar
plantations, and Europe's sweet tooth wanted more. Besides losing
Haiti, the French had lost most all of its territory in North America
to England several decades earlier.
Napoleon
was determined to reassert France's presence in the Americas. His
plan: send a large armada across the Atlantic, recapture Haiti,
occupy New Orleans, and reap the economic benefits of a French empire
in the New World. Haiti and New Orleans were doomed. How could the
backward Haitians manage to fend off a far larger, better-equipped
French invading army? And as for the Americans, what would happen if
New Orleans fell into French hands? The impact was obvious to them:
American agricultural goods from the new farmlands west of the
Appalachian Mountains would never get back to the original 13 states.
They'd be bottled up between the mountains and a hostile French New
Orleans and Louisiana Territory. The US expansion westward would slow
to a trickle and America's future grandness would likely never be
realized. It was a glum outlook for the fledgling American states.
The
fierce Haitians met the French landing forces of tens of thousands of
troops. Outgunned and out numbered, the former slaves were fighting
for their very survival. Furthermore, they were enraged by a
deceitful trick Napoleon had played on them, a couple of years
earlier, when he feigned negotiations with their brilliant
revolutionary leader, Toussaint L'Overture. Instead, Napoleon
captured the former slave hero, took him back to France, and killed
him. Napoleon's karma for that evil deed was to watch the former
slaves of Haiti trounce his army and send send them limping back to
France. The ferocity of the Haitians was aided by an epidemic of
yellow fever that helped to decimate the French army.
Hooray
for Haiti! But the consequences of the French humiliation were even
greater for the budding United States. Defeated, Napoleon never
attempted to capture New Orleans. America's westward expansion
exploded. In another couple of years Thomas Jefferson would purchase
New Orleans and all of the Louisiana Territory west of the
Mississippi River from France for a bargain. So how is it that France
came to acquire Louisiana from Spain, in the meantime? Spain, hurting
for cash and seeing its American empire begin to crumble, had sold
the territory to France, who then sold it to Jefferson, when
Napoleon's subsequent martial adventures stalled in Europe and
Russia, and he needed the cash.
So
there you have it: our American debt to the former slaves of Haiti.
While we Americans headed west and became evermore powerful, Haiti
was later doomed to fall back under French influence, when (in order
to acquire French recognition of Haitian independence) Haiti was
saddled with a monetary debt that required over half a century to
repay. Ironically, rather than acknowledge our “freedom-to-expand”
debt to Haiti, the US played a significant role in the subsequent
exploitation of that Caribbean island. In 1915 US marines landed in
Haiti to protect American business interests there. It was just one
more example of US interference in the Americas. Our debt to the
Haitian people remains unpaid.
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Bullying Carpenter Bees—Part 2
So
I've decided that these guys are real insects. But what are
they up to? Are they really threatening? Am I in danger of getting a
painful sting? Once, long ago, a bumble bee stung me; it's not an
experience I'd ever wish to repeat. So what's going on? What has
changed, to bring these pesky little buzzers around, these last few
years? Does their intrusive presence indicate a future “Planet of
the Bees” horrible scenario? And what's their bullying got to do
with me? I'm just doing my thing around the homestead—quiet and
peaceful like. Go bother someone else—someone who is causing
trouble!
Needing
to comprehend this bee bullying, I once again turned to the internet
for help. On a University of Kentucky website I learned that the
carpenter bee I'm seeing is the male. They are very aggressive, as
they protect the nest that their mate has prepared and populated with
eggs. Said nest is a hole drilled into wood by mom, into which she
deposits half a dozen eggs—each one tucked up against a ball of
pollen (the only source of food for these bees). In a week or so, the
larva will emerge, dine on its private pollen ball, and begin its
seven-week-long life—maybe pestering another innocent human by buzzing around them?
The
fascinating fact about these critters is that the aggressive
male—that guy who's bullying me—is stingerless! Talk about
chutzpah! He's in my face and faking it. He's relying on his
substantial size and his threatening buzz to intimidate me... and
it's worked! But now, armed with my newly-acquired knowledge, you
better watch out, buster; the next time you dive bomb me, I'll get
right back in your face and maybe even whap you around a bit. I'm
wise to you now.
So
I'll go about my business, no longer intimidated by the bullying
carpenter bees—although it's difficult to overcome that startled
reaction that evolution has built into us, to a big bee's buzzing.
It's like the innate aversion we have when we spot a snake. Even
after I have learned to appreciate our local snakes' predation of
voles, mice, and other bothersome rodents, I still get a flutter of
my heart when I spot a serpent—especially if it's only a few feet
away.
I
think my biggest (and legitimate) concern about carpenter bees is the
holes that mama bee drills in our numerous wooden support structures.
The internet told me that she can bore holes a foot or two deep in
wood. (Good lord! That's equivalent to me tunneling some 150 feet!)
Good thing I'm known for overbuilding my structures—I always
fashion beams and rafters at least twice the size they need be. Maybe
I'll require that extra safety margin, as I now realize that the
buzzing carpenter bee is harmless to my hide, but not to wood.
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Bullying Carpenter Bees—Part 1
The
last couple of years have seen a passel of carpenter bees flying
about and hovering in the air around our clearing in the woods. They
zoom into your face, getting up close and personal—seemingly
challenging your right to be there. They're big (at least an inch
long) and they're noisy. Their buzz commands your attention and is
rather unnerving, as you warily turn towards them, wondering if you
are under attack. They intimidate people and seem to know it.
A
carpenter bee is the size of a big ol' bumblebee. Where the latter is
striped black and yellow with a hairy body, the carpenter bee's
abdomen is black and shiny. Out of the corner of your eye one will be
challenging you, looking like a miniature Darth Vader in his
insidious space craft. It's distracting, at the least.
Carpenter
bees were rather uncommon around here several years ago. I'd see one
only occasionally, as it plunged into a perfectly round hole that it
had drilled in wood; or emerging from said hole, to fly off, quickly
out of sight. But in the last couple of years we have seen lots of
them, in all parts of our clearing. Has global warming increased
their numbers, as well as their swagger? Have we added a large enough
number of wooden structures around the homestead, that the word is
spreading around the carpenter bee world, about all the choice
nesting sites here?
Whatever
is happening, they have certainly become common, as they hover
nearby, acting like miniature drones who are surveilling us. Several
days ago—sort of in a paranoid mood—I found myself wondering if
they actually could be tiny CIA drones. The government is more and
more into monitoring us innocent citizens. (I know, I know; I have
nothing to worry about, if I'm innocent... but what does innocent
mean these days?) Cities have CCTV surveillance (they call them
“security”) cameras perched everywhere, catching all sorts of
nefarious activities. Maybe carpenter bee drones have been invented
to keep an eye on us country folks?
I
quickly shook off my paranoia, realizing that the bees' incredible
flight acrobatics I am watching are well beyond the skills of the
current generation of CIA drones. (Although they're improving on them
all the time... maybe next year? Oops, there goes my paranoia again.)
The
bees pestering us suddenly appear, hover for a moment, and then dart
off at warp speed—instantly circling the garden shed and
reappearing behind you, menacingly buzzing, three feet away. They are
not just buzzing us; at times two of them will face off, spin
around each other in a kind of bee aerial combat, and then scream
off—one chasing the other. So these are real bees, not secret spies
built by the CIA.
More
on carpenter bees next time...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





