Showing posts with label Hubble Telescope. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hubble Telescope. Show all posts

Monday, September 6, 2021

Astral Origins

Our universe sprang into existence nearly 14 billion years ago—according to astronomy’s current understanding (the date is as yet not absolutely accepted as gospel… science often updates itself). For something like 100 million years after that Big Bang origin, the cosmos dramatically expanded, but would have been essentially invisible at the time, as it consisted almost entirely of hydrogen gas ions. Darkness prevailed and stars had not yet formed. It was a pretty bleak and lonely universe.

Then the first stars began to form some 200 million years after the Big Bang. The cosmos was still rapidly expanding at the time, but now some of that hydrogen began to clump into clouds. Gravity exerted its force and those hydrogen clouds began to compress—increasingly so, until the first stars winked on... or rather ignited, from the intense pressure. That point in time is sometimes called the “cosmic dawn.” Now starlight illuminated the nascent universe. It was no longer totally dark.


Astronomers are very curious about the birth of those first stars. If they could be observed by telescope, our knowledge of the workings of the early universe would be significantly expanded. What were they like? How large and bright were they? What happened next, in the unfolding of the universe? The answers to these questions would help validate our current understanding and models of the cosmos or show us where they may be in error and thus how to improve them.


The most powerful telescope that currently peers not quite that far back in time is the Hubble Space Telescope—the workhorse that has for 30 years shown us some amazing photos and helped confirm our existing cosmic models. Hubble reaches back tantalizingly close to the cosmic dawn, but cannot quite image those first stars.


NASA's James Webb Telescope is the next step in capability beyond Hubble, and astronomers have high hopes that this telescope will reach back to those initial stars and offer some answers to our questions. Astronomers have all their fingers and toes crossed—hoping that the James Webb scope will finally be launched this November. Its launch date has repeatedly been postponed for several years, due to design flaws and thus the program's cost is astronomically over budget. A lot of nail biting will be done by NASA employees between now and November, when it may actually be launched. A lot of money and prestige may soon be lost or, alternatively, gloriously resulting in new discoveries.


[A brief reminder: Due to the continuous expansion of our universe, these long-ago star-birth events occurred at vast distances from Earth... so vast that light (the fastest moving thing in the cosmos) takes billions of years to reach us, to allow us to see these events. So when we first view the light from these initial stars, we will be actually detecting light that shown forth from them, over 13 billion years ago. Those rays may be new to us, but they've been en route across the vastness of space for that long.]


Wednesday, April 3, 2013

More Beautiful



An article in a September 2012 Guardian newspaper makes the case for, as its title describes, “Science is More Beautiful Than Art.” The point being made by the (science) writer is that science is bringing us ever more beautiful images, in the way of gorgeous and breathtaking photos from the Hubble Space Telescope, deep sea pictures, and recently-discovered exotic animals, for example. And, as if the photos are not stunning enough, he writes that science brings us mind-bending descriptions of quantum mechanics, insights into the wonders of deep space, and opens the beauty of the world of mathematics.

The article notes that, while art has traditionally demonstrated the beauty and higher workings of the human mind, science pushes our minds even further than art. It stimulates our imagination more.

I have pondered the point of this article in recent months, feeling a general sense of agreement, but still not quite buying it all. Given my science training and past research work, I have always had an interest in and sympathy with the sentiments of those who see lovely and charming things in science. I’ve always thought that science presents us elegant messages and theories—in the sense that they are both ingenious and simple. But science more beautiful than art?

Then it hit me a few days ago what my reluctance about the article is: I don’t think that science is what’s beautiful; it’s what science reveals to us about the natural world that is delightful and appealing. There is nothing in the realm of human accomplishment that can inspire awe in me like certain sunsets, the sight of a red cardinal at the birdfeeder, a Hubble Telescope image of a distant galaxy, the delicacy of a flower blossom, the breeze-induced sway of a large oak tree, the sight of Appalachian Mountain ridges receding into the hazy distance, and the graceful flight of a hawk.

Yes, human art can lift us up and thrill our senses, but it doesn’t hold a candle in my mind to the wonders of nature. For those who live in urban areas, it’s easy to become overly focused on the human species’ accomplishments in the various fields of art. I believe one can cure that bias by traveling to the country, lying back on the ground on a clear night, and gazing into the sky, or becoming mesmerized by the stunning colors of a sunset.