One
of the basic pillars of the theory of evolution is the fact that
every species gives birth to far more offspring than the planet can
sustain. This fact sets up a perpetual competition for survival among
species. Those creatures who are the most fit survive in a given
situation and pass their genes into the future. Those less fit die
out, or never get a chance to procreate. It's that simple.
A
key part of this scenario is the fact that tiny mutations randomly
occur, each time a newborn comes into the world. The DNA of every
species is duplicated at birth with an amazingly high degree of
accuracy, but because there are millions upon millions of DNA copies
to be made, tiny copying errors will inevitably creep in.
Those
errors are precisely the source of tiny variations between otherwise
identical offspring. Thus, one baby within a family will slightly be
different from another. One sparrow born in Georgia will be a wee bit
genetically different from one born in Florida, or even within the
same locale in Georgia.
These
slight differences rarely have any import, but should the
environment—or other external conditions shift ever so slightly,
one critter may fare better than another. The Georgia sparrow, for
example, may have a slightly more yellow color. That yellower sparrow
may be less visible to new predators—who, say, have migrated there
due to climate change—who don't see yellow as well. Thus the yellow
birds will live to have babies, who will also have the yellower gene.
The result: yellower sparrows win the competition for survival.
This
is basically how life has evolved on Earth. Every time environmental
conditions have shifted, some critters—just by luck—are more fit
in the new environment, and they successfully send their modified
genes into the future. This amazing process is what has allowed life
on our planet to adapt to changing conditions, and then to evolve new
life forms to thrive in new conditions. This process would not happen
without an overabundance of babies born to each species (otherwise
every baby would prosper and never face the prospect of an early
death). There would be no competition between their minuscule
differences, to see which one wins.
One
way to appreciate this magnificent process is to ponder what might
happen if life on Earth had settled into some kind of happy stasis,
where no competition occurred. What if the number of babies born was
exactly what was needed to sustain each species? Wouldn't that be
much more peaceful? If that were the case, there would be far less competition, no survival of the fittest, no dog-eat-dog world. Every
critter would find its happy place; the lion could even lie down with
the lamb.
But
what would such a world be like? For one, evolution would simply not
occur. Every critter would be content, would be secure, and would be
very comfortable. No changes. Everything would become static and
unvarying. This might sound nice, but what would happen if a small
perturbation in the environment happened to occur? All those placid critters
would suddenly be faced with challenges for which they are totally
unprepared. There would be massive extinctions. Life, that would
long have ago settled into a kind of inactivity, would now be unable
to respond. Most creatures would go instinct!
So
we might well celebrate what appears to be a brutish form of
competition in nature, where too many babies are born and most of
them die or get eaten. It may appear to be cold-hearted and devoid of
any gentleness, but it has kept life vital, robust, and progressive,
for several billion years. Let us be thankful for nature's wisdom.
No comments:
Post a Comment