Something
similar has happened in the field of embodied cognition. People have
built robots for a long time, and some of them—especially when they
look like a human and sort of act like one—have been very
impressive. But again, these robots could do only what their
designers had programmed their “brains” to do.
What was
frustrating and limiting was that every action the robot did required
enormous computing power—yet those actions were quite simple. If
the robot encountered something the scientists had not thought to
include in its software, the robot would spectacularly fail. Maybe
its designers had cleverly (and very complexly) programmed the robot
to walk upstairs, but if it stepped on a marble, it'd tumble over and
lie incapacitated. And any robot that accomplished impressive feats
required such brainpower that it gulped large quantities of energy
and drained its batteries quickly. (Our human brain is an energy
hog.)
When
researchers realized the finesse, efficiency, and proficiency of EC
and began to build robots based on this principle, those robots are
taking the next quantum leap into the future. The EC principle
allowed them to create robots that move uncannily like humans and
other animals, without much computer power and without the need for
the robot's “brain” to plan and execute every move.
To
watch a video of a robot programmed with EC is rather astonishing—if
not also a little eerie. (This link gives you a number of such
videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/BostonDynamics).
Boston Dynamics has built several of them and has demonstrated how
capable and autonomous they are. Take one of these robots outdoors,
where it encounters terrain that it's never negotiated before—uneven
ground, snow and ice, deep mud—and it does better than a human can.
You watch one of the robot's feet slip or get bogged down, and it
stumbles, awkwardly pirouettes, but quickly recovers. Another video
shows a human researcher sneaking up behind a robot and giving it a
violent shove with a stick. The robot stumbles forward, catches its
balance, and continues its previous activity.
These
amazing accomplishments have researchers very excited and furiously
engaged in experiments to improve what these smart machines can do.
The future in the fields of AI and EC is nearly upon us. What comes
next? What novel accomplishments will we soon see? The promises are
both thrilling and sobering—even rather ominous.
For
example, what happens when the cognitive abilities of an AI computer
exceed those of the human brain? It's only a matter of time. They
have already demonstrated the ability to best humans in a few kinds
of intelligence tests, but yet still fall quite short of the human
brain's overall flexible abilities. That threshold will soon be crossed,
however. When it happens, will an AI computer then be able to reason,
become self-aware, or even possess consciousness?
These
questions interfere with the sleep of some scientists and
philosophers. They are worrisome to many people. A few people even
fear that computers might take over the world and force us feeble
humans to be their slaves. This fear has spawned a few fascinating
books and movies. Nobody knows what will happen. What is
disconcerting, at the least, is that research is moving quickly
forward, with little consideration of where we are going or what
precautions should be made. (That's an old story with human
technology.)
Something
similar might be said about EC robots. Most of the current research
in this area is being sponsored by the military. What are their plans
for these smart machines? Obviously, these robots will someday
perform much more effectively on the battlefield than human
soldiers—being stronger, faster, and more invincible. The death of
a robot—no matter its price—is far less onerous than the
death of a soldier. But what might happen when a platoon of EC robots
invades what is believed to be a fortified bunker of enemy soldiers,
and finds it instead occupied by a group of cowering women and
children? Will these smart machines also have the moral sense to halt
their invasion?
Both
AI and EC robots promise some wonderful benefits. But like so much
technology of the past, what was once seen as a blessing sometimes
had a dark side. Are we being careful enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment