The
second message: Democritus'
atomistic and natural teachings interestingly connect directly into
my second point: death is not what people fear or say that it is.
This second idea was promulgated primarily by my second Greek
teacher, Epicurus. Starting with the concept of atoms and how that
led to the idea that our world can be understood by natural events,
he came to the conclusion that previous beliefs that the world was
governed by supernatural forces were wrong. In his time, supernatural
meant that the gods were the driving force in the world—the gods
decided (often in their capricious manner) how things were
constructed and how they behaved. Later (in the West) the Greek and
Roman gods were replaced by the sole Abrahamic God.
If
the gods are in
charge of our existence, then we are susceptible to their will. Our
lives are literally controlled by their whims and wishes... and there wishes are often whimsical. Epicurus said, however, that there are
natural explanations for it all; it's not the gods stringing us
along, thus our lives are really in our own hands. We are in control
and are responsible for ourselves. This is a very liberating idea!
Those who believed that the gods ruled, believed that their lives—and
their deaths—were
dictated supernaturally. More to the point, what happened to you
after
your death, was also in the hands of the gods. If they wished, they
could torment you forever, and you had little alternative, except to
try your best to curry their favor in this life. Epicurus saw that
the anxiety over this belief caused people a lot of torment and
filled them with fear.
A
more modern expression of this concept has recently been offered by
Yuval Harari, the Israeli author of a recent groundbreaking book,
Sapiens.
He makes the point that, in recent centuries, modern interpretations
no longer see death as the fundamental source of meaning of life.
Previous beliefs—from Christians all the way back to the Romans and
Greeks—held that the meaning of life comes from what happens to you
after
death. Instead, he maintains that modern ideologies—such as
socialism, liberalism, feminism, and communism—teach us that life
has meaning on its own; we don't need death for meaning. It is
interesting that my three favorite philosophers reached this modern
conclusion millennia ago. It's yet another way that shows they were
far ahead of their time.
Epicurus
felt that he had—through his natural explanations of the
world—shown that belief in an afterlife was unfounded. There are no
supernatural events—in this world or the hereafter. You live and
then you die. Quit fearing what will happen after you die, since
there will be no you. Put your attention to what you're doing while
you are alive. I don't think he actually said it, but one message I
take from his teaching is, regardless of what happens after I die, if
I put attention toward living a moral life, I'll be OK. The main point: I can take
comfort in the fact that I will not be tricked by the gods. Epicurus
in fact never denied the existence of the gods—he simply maintained
that they have their own affairs to attend to, so why should they
waste time tormenting humans? In today's monotheistic worldview, I
feel the same. I neither believe in nor deny the existence of God. If
there is a God, I can't see why God would bother with my trivial
life. It's my responsibility to use it wisely and morally, or lose
it. Why would God interfere?
The
third message: Live simply,
rather than pursue money or power. This idea follows quite closely
from the first two propositions. If we're all made of atoms and thus
are all united (are all made of the same stuff), what does that tell
me about how to treat my world and my fellow humans? If I abuse my
world, am I not abusing myself? Democritus, Epicurus, and Lucretius
all reached the same conclusion: that treating our world with respect
means that we should live a frugal life. To exploit the world in
search of wealth is simply selfish and wrong.
We
are part of the natural world. We live and die, as all creatures do.
We need not fear death or the gods. So how do I fit most sensibly
into this incredible world? I do so by having regard for it; by
nurturing it and my fellow creatures. These three masters realized
that this truth of our being an integral part of the natural world
meant that we share the same aims all creatures do: to seek happiness
and contentment, while avoiding pain and suffering. Living simply and
frugally is an excellent way to achieve those aims.
No comments:
Post a Comment