Why
is it that we humans so easily develop negative images of people
unlike us? We seem to be predisposed to have prejudicial perceptions
of the other: people of a different color, religion, politics, etc.
We seem to be quite ready to believe the worst about “those
people.” With minimal information about them we leap to conclusions
that they are “bad guys,” and then require mountains of positive
data to turn our impressions around, in order to look upon them
favorably.
This
propensity for negative stereotyping is a serious problem in society,
especially as social media and biased websites feed us prejudicial
beliefs. Society has become increasingly polarized, as people become
swayed by these negative images. Why can't we be kinder to each
other?
Some
recent research sheds a little light on the issue. The findings of
sophisticated brain scans conclusively show that our brain responds
more strongly and quickly to information about groups who are
portrayed unfavorably, than it does about people we like and view
favorably. The researchers were not trying to examine existing
built-in prejudices of the subjects tested, but instead created new
negative feelings about some previously neutral object and then
watched what happened in the brain, in order to gain knowledge of
what is going on in there.
What
they found is that activity in the anterior temporal pole (ATP)
occurred when subjects were fed prejudiced information about an
object or person. As the negative information was repeated, ATP
activity gradually increased—reinforcing the created bias. In
contrast, when a test subject was informed that a “bad person”
had done something good, the ATP was quiet. Similarly, when the
subject was given information about “good people,” the ATP was
also quiet.
Interestingly,
for these two latter situations—while the ATP was inactive—the
prefrontal cortex (PFC) of the subject became activated. This is the
part of the brain where higher-level cognitive functioning occurs.
So, while the ATP seems to be involved in knee-jerk prejudicial
thinking, when we respond more positively, we seem to use the
analyzing skills of the PFC to counter our bias. It seems that we
need to consciously work on seeing the positive.
This
research, as is true for much scientific research, does a neat job of
answering the “How?” question. But why do we react so
intolerably? It seems that the reason is most likely the result of
evolution. Here's the process: Our brain uses many tricks to simplify
its job. Every second, our senses bombard the brain with mountains of
information. In order not to become swamped, the brain cleverly
simplifies and abbreviates this information. One of the simplifying
tricks the brain does is to cluster people into groups, since it cuts
down on the amount of data that the brain must process. Long ago,
when we lived in small bands, it was advantageous for us to
automatically lean toward classifying the “other” (say, someone
in another tribe) negatively—it was safer to do so. Better to think
that that guy I meet out in the bush means harm to me—especially if
he looks weird—and take defensive action. To do so, I might live
another day, especially if he is threatening.
This
predilection to look unfavorably on the “other” may have been
once useful for survival in that simple world. It's not so useful
today, when we have societal mechanisms in place to better insure
that people behave and that the “other” may turn out to be a
pretty good guy after all. Maybe it's time we exercised our
introspective prefrontal cortex more and let our knee-jerk anterior
temporal pole relax.
No comments:
Post a Comment