So
what is the value of a list of negative instructions? To begin with,
it leaves one with room for varying interpretations of a situation,
so the guidelines can be adaptable to different situations. The lack
of explicitness provides for a flexibility that can change with time
and circumstances.
As
another way to look at it, at any moment there are a wide variety of
actions I could take. Which of these actions would cause me problems
in the future and which would be beneficial for me and others? It's
often not obvious. If some kind of inner negative guidance helps me
avoid doing something stupid, I can dodge a lot of problem behaviors.
That's good. Then I can put attention toward the many other (better)
alternatives, trusting my daemon to steer me clear of the grief of
poor choices. I thus have much more freedom and autonomy.
The
numerous (positive) alternative choices can open up a whole new world
of possibilities that I might otherwise have never explored. Which
are the “right” choices to select? There may be no right
choice, but instead a host of good choices, each one resulting in
something new and wonderful. With help from my daemon, I've been
granted the freedom to pursue any number of creative avenues and
avoid dead ends. New worlds open up to me that I could never have
imagined—especially if I had been pushed toward just one choice. If
I can trust the voice of the daemon to steer me away from stupid
choices, I'm free to find alternatives that I might otherwise never
have discovered.
Another
way to consider this is that the inner daemon can alternatively be
considered to be a voice of conscience or prudence. Thus, it can
become a voice of moral authority, because it can stop me from doing
unethical things. That's exactly how Socrates saw it. As he pondered
a certain action, and if the voice was silent, he assumed that the
action was moral, was appropriate, or good.
In
fact, during his trial before his fellow Athenians, Socrates had
several opportunities to acquit himself, but because his daemon
remained silent, he did not play it safe, but stuck his neck out, to
find it under attack. In the end, he concluded that death was OK,
because it is not evil—otherwise his daemon would have advised him
to use his considerable persuasive oratorical talents to save
himself.
I
find inspiration in Socrates' description of how his negative daemon
guided him through life. There is no audible inner voice of mine that
I have been able to discern, but the concept of some kind of
conscience that steers me away from immoral behavior, while leaving
me free to choose the many ethical behaviors available, is inspiring.
Socrates is a good guide for heading in an ethical direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment