To
return to Bentham's insistence that it is our very nature to seek
pleasure (happiness) and avoid pain, it is interesting that he
reached his conclusion over half a century before Darwin had the
insight that evolution was the cause of our innate drives. While
Bentham grasped the fact that this behavior for all creatures was
“natural,” Darwin described for us how it came to be. That
is, those critters who were good at finding pleasure and avoiding
pain were more likely to survive, because their lives were more
robust and fit, and they succeeded in passing on this capability to
their offspring. In contrast, animals who did not succeed were more
likely to perish—if only because their quality of life was poor—and
not have offspring.
One
of the challenges of those who subscribe to Bentham's ideas of
utilitarianism is to know when we've acquired enough pleasure or
happiness. Can we control ourselves, so that life does not become one
extended obsession of seeking pleasure? Humans have not been very
good at reining in their greed. In fact, too many of those who get a
taste of pleasure go overboard with it. A prime example is today's
ultra-rich who seize all they can get and create overwhelming
economic inequality. Bentham and others saw that it must be the job
of government to check inequality and ensure justice for the
populace. It's not working very well in the US, today, however,
largely due to the fact that the super rich pretty much control
government through their corporate power.
On
the other side of the coin, we can ask: Should we go to extremes to
avoid pain? Is all pain bad? It may be natural for us to shun pain,
but are there occasions when we might need to face it? Unlike
animals, our cognitive abilities can help us examine the need to
avoid pain all the time, and do something about it. Doesn't it make
sense to visit the dentist and endure the discomforting prick of the
novocaine needle and have a cavity filled, so I won't have to endure
much greater pain later, when the tooth becomes abscessed? As another
example, I attribute a good deal of the enduring relationship I have
with my wife to the discomfort we endured during several conflict
resolution sessions we have had over the years. It was downright
painful to have to admit a few times that I was wrong in something I
did or said.
Volumes
of philosophical tomes and many psychological studies have pondered
the struggle to balance pleasure and pain. Like most issues of
philosophy, there never is a clear and final truth to be discovered.
Life is too complex for that.
Maybe
the best we can do is to make ourselves as aware of the inherent
nature of pleasure and pain as we can, and then move through life,
constantly seeking the appropriate balance at each step along the
way. Seek happiness, but don't go overboard with it. Control
yourself. Similarly, the avoidance of pain is natural, but it seems
to me that it's more a case of taking a close look and having the
courage to face pain when it makes sense to—especially when it
brings the opportunity to learn. It doesn't make sense,
however, to invite unnecessary pain into our lives. That just
causes damage.
No comments:
Post a Comment