Old
trees do become more and more magnificent, as the years
pass... especially giants like redwoods and sequoia (or oaks and
poplars, here in Virginia). I have had the opportunity a couple of
times to stand at the base of some of these patriarchs and feel awed
by their massive trunks and humbled by how they soar up into the
heavens. It makes me feel simultaneously small and grand, to be close
to one. It seems a tragedy when one of these behemoths is toppled for
furniture.
Trees
are also a major source of the oxygen that we animals breathe. They
do double duty by both absorbing carbon dioxide from the air (thus
countering global warming) as they simultaneously exhaust that
life-giving oxygen. We need them, and they are being cut down at a
terrifying rate.
There's
been much attention in recent years put to the benefits of trees and
other vegetation, in countering the heavy load of CO2 that
we are dumping into the atmosphere. But what kind of vegetation
extracts the most carbon? Should we protect those kinds of plants
more than others? Are they more valuable to the planet (and us)?
It
has been assumed that fast-growing young trees are more valuable than
big, old trees for removing carbon. But a recent study tells a
different story. An international team of researchers published an
article in the scientific journal Nature,
showing that old trees are not
less productive than robust young trees, but significantly more
so. Because elderly trees vigorously continue to add mass—even into
their senile period—they soak up more carbon than the juveniles
do... as much as three times
more!
Since
I'm rapidly headed into my
senile period, I take comfort from the fact that my old woody buddies
that surround me aren't slowing down. Maybe they can inspire me to
resist the ravages of age and continue to thrive as they do. I think
I'll go out and hug a big ol' tree.
No comments:
Post a Comment