Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Sore Nuthatch
Here are two photos of a white-breasted nuthatch that slammed into a window and stunned himself, allowing me to get close to snap a photo. He later flew off, thankfully. Click to enlarge.
Thursday, November 19, 2015
Dopamine Dupes
There
has been plenty news in recent years about the impact that dopamine
and opioids have on our brains. They are chemicals created in the
brain. They strongly influence our moods—causing us to feel good,
and often get us hooked on these feelings, making us want more and
more. In fact, some people become so hooked that they become dopamine
(or opioid) dupes. But let's back up a bit first.
The
brain creates two kinds of chemicals that get us excited and feeling
pleasurable: dopamine and opioids. They are so desirable that many
people seek external sources of these chemicals to flush their brain
with, in order to get or sustain those good feelings. Opioids make us
feel pleasure. When they get released into the brain, we can become
content to sit around in a satiated stupor. When the British wanted
to control the Chinese population in the middle 1800s, they made
opium cheap and available—literally transforming the Chinese into
comatose zombies. Today's heroin-use epidemic is another example of
over-the-top opioid craving.
Popular
belief thinks that the dopamine system in the brain is about
pleasure, but that's not really true. It's more about seeking.
The dopamine system is stronger than the opioid system, but they are
also complementary; they work together. Dopamine stimulates your
curiosity and spurs you into action. If that action finds something
good, your opioid system gets you to pause and soak up the pleasure.
Evolution
gave us these brain chemical enjoyments. The dopamine system makes us
curious; gets us motivated to seek the things we need to survive;
such as food, sex, and creative ideas. It urges us to check out what
may be around the corner or over the next hill. It makes us want
things. It stimulates desire.
Although
dopamine was once crucial for our very survival and existence, it can
today cause some problems. Unlike our hominid ancestors, we are
surrounded by objects that can bring us instant gratification—toys
that constantly seize our attention and promise excitement. Our smart
phones ring at us, promising rewards; apps entice us to use them for
thrilling awards. Twitter and texting ping at us—offering instant
communication and the possibility of novel stimulation. We go
online—maybe even for a good reason—and find ourselves a couple
of hours later aimlessly cruising the internet. We turn on the TV and
all kinds of enticing images suck us in. We can't stop the
dopamine-induced loop that hooks our brain. We've become a dopamine
dupe.
Where
our forbears benefited from the brain rushes of dopamine and opioids,
we are in danger of becoming addicted. Our ancestors found rewards
and pleasures to be scarce. They needed to keep seeking, in order to
survive. Manufacturers and advertisers of the countless items that
pique our curiosity are almost holding us ransom in an opioid
stupor—much like the Chinese in their 1800s opium dens. Our
high-tech toys are certainly addictive.
How
do we keep from getting hooked on the release of these brain
chemicals? Awareness is a good first step... awareness of our
propensity to seek pleasure and then veg out, when we get it. And we
can turn off the electronic devices, or at least adjust them so we
don't get constant notifications of the arrival of the next email,
tweet, or text. Are you willing to wean yourself from their promise
of yet another dopamine hit, or another opioid jolt?
Saturday, November 14, 2015
Six Years of Saturn
Here are photos of Saturn--by NASA--taken over a six year period. Over this span of time our view of the rings changes, as their angle changes. Click to enlarge.
Sunday, November 8, 2015
Ethics from Awe?
Awe
is an emotion I have experienced much more often, after having moved
from the big city three decades ago to a rural setting in the woods.
As I slowed down and opened myself up to the many wonders of my
world, the experiences of awe and reverence occurred much more often.
Where I once seemed to require a trip to some distant land to invoke
a feeling of awe, it now seemed as if very simple things, like the
sight of a bird taking flight or the swaying of a tall tree, could
bring about that sense of amazement.
I
have often used the word “awe” to describe my feeling of wonder,
without always pausing to be sure I am using it properly or really
delving deeper into the meaning of the word. My wonderings about the
deeper meaning of awe was recently piqued when I read about the
results of a study of awe conducted at the University of California
at Irvine. The results helped me to realize how powerful and
influential awe really can be.
First,
consider the definition of awe, as given by the Oxford English
Dictionary: “a feeling of reverential respect mixed with fear or
wonder.” Yes, that seems to capture the emotion, but I was
intrigued by the use of the word “fear” in the definition. As I
pondered it, I realized that when we feel awe, it's often because the
thing we're viewing not only is magnificent, but can also cause us to
feel very small and timid in its presence. Standing atop a mountain
and gazing out at some vast scene can put us in our place—not just
to feel diminished, but also to feel that we are a tiny part of a
vast universe; a universe both fantastic and intimidating. Watching a thunderstorm brings about both wonder and alarm.
In
fact, the researchers at UC Irvine found that people who experienced
awe were more inclined to be generous and kind afterward. That is a
fascinating finding! Their study discovered that awe can literally
cause us to reduce the focus on ourselves; that we begin to forgo
self-interest and become more inclined to want to improve the welfare
of our world and other people. In other words, awe can not only
invoke a reverential feeling, but induce us to become more ethical in
our behavior. That's a causal connection I'd never realized before,
but it seems logical that after being moved by the wonder of some
experience, one would be more likely to act more altruistically. In
contrast, I'm certainly not going to want to feel kindly toward
others after I have had a shocking and revolting experience!
So
I wonder: has a more frequent experience of awe made me a more
ethical person? That's a judgment I don't feel inclined to make, but
I do appreciate reading about research to this effect. It helps me
feel gratitude that awe comes more often to me these days. It also is
a good reminder that it can be counterproductive to try to bring the
world down to my size; to render it something within my dominion or
under my control. If I can let go of that feeling of mastery and
allow myself to feel amazed—even a little fearful—it just might
become beneficial to my behavior.
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Alignment of Moon and Planets
The Moon and three planets (Jupiter, Venus, and Mars) were aligned this morning before dawn (Nov 4, 2015). Click to enlarge.
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Einstein's Errors—Part 2
So
Einstein is still king of physics... his ideas remain true. Yet many
an experimental physicist over this last century has planned a test
with the secret desire of showing Albert to be wrong in one of his
basic ideas. One reason is that scientists always try to show a
theory is wrong... and if they fail, it gives them more confidence
that the theory is right. But also, if an experimenter could
demonstrate a major flaw in one of Einstein's theories, wouldn't that
gain him everlasting fame? If E = mc2 was not correct,
wouldn't that knock the socks off the scientific world? If something
was discovered to move faster than the speed of light, how
might that rattle the foundations of science?
In
fact, four years ago worldwide headlines frenetically trumpeted that
an experimental research team in Europe had announced that their
measurements indicated that neutrinos traveled faster than the speed
of light. That news set off a string of wild speculations in the
public mind. Einstein—the god of physics—wrong? The absolute
upper speed limit of the universe broken? It was almost as dramatic
as demonstrating that the sun does revolve around the Earth.
Many people chuckled knowingly, contending that they hadn't believed
in Albert's speed limit anyway.
Most
scientists were quoted as being convinced that something in the
neutrino experiment had to be flawed—the whole foundation of
physics rested on the fact that nothing moved faster than light. Even
the team of researchers who ran the experiment doubted their result,
but their measurements had repeatedly found the same thing. In fact,
their announcement was partly intended to get the world's physicists
to examine their work and find a flaw. A flurry of activity occurred
over the following year and suggested modifications were tried. The
measurement error was found, soliciting a collective scientific sigh
of relief that the speed of light had prevailed.
I
find it interesting that the popular press has been far more subdued
in announcing that Einstein was right, than when they snickered about
his error. It's similar to someone tweeting some fantastic phony
claim (“Obama is a Muslim!”) that goes viral, spreading instantly
across the globe's viewing screens. Careful fact checking soon
disproves the false assertion, but the damage has been done. The
correction never gets the equal notoriety that the first phony claim
did. (Day one headline: “Obama was not born in America!” Day two
correction in tiny print on page 17: “Yes he was.”)
I
think, that here on the 100th anniversary of Einsteins'
general theory of relativity, there is more to a scientist's
motivation for trying to disprove his ideas than wanting to go down
in history as the guy who out-thought the great man. There is a
propensity for people to make someone like Einstein a hero or create
a god-like vision of him. The public image grows over the years, as
the vision expands. But other people dream of knocking the hero down
from the pedestal, to show that he's a fake after all.
I'm
not sure what all motivates some people to want to see that Einstein
was wrong. The case of the faster-than-light neutrino was a recent
spectacular example. I take comfort from the fact that Albert broke
the physics mold over a century ago and that his insights are still
very much intact. You rock, Albert!
Saturday, October 17, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







