Sunday, July 1, 2012
Sunday, June 24, 2012
You Are Not You--Part 2
All this anti-bacterial frenzy ignores the truth that our
bodies cannot live without our friends the bacteria. In just the last few
decades has science begun to realize the beneficial role of many types of
internal bacteria. We’d best learn to call a truce in our bacterial wars, or
we’re gonna crash and become part of our own “collateral damage.”
But breeding new species of super bugs is not the only
unfortunate fallout of our war on bacteria. Some recent research seems to be
pointing the way toward the increasing incidence of autoimmune diseases and
other chronic modern ailments. It’s still a mystery exactly why such diseases
as Crohn’s disease, type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and others are
escalating, but our blundering is probably involved. We are altering our
environment and upsetting biological balances that were built over eons. It’s
becoming clear that antibiotics are a significant cause of autoimmune
disorders. How?
The driving force behind our immune system is not a
self-contained mechanism run by us, but is created primarily by beneficial
bacteria. Ever since we became a separate species (about 200,000 years ago),
our immune system has been able to tread a delicate balance between being too
lax (thus failing to detect and battle foreign pathogens) and too aggressive (and
attacking our own cells). Beneficial bacteria have trained our immune system to
achieve that crucial balance. It’s not our own DNA that does the job, but
bacterial (non-human) DNA. But now we’re upsetting that balance. We’ve
saturated our bodies with antibiotics to the point that our immune system is
confused and sometimes attacks our own cells.
Another way we mess up our immune system is by not exposing
babies to dirt. We’ve become so obsessed with protecting our newborns from
nasty bugs that we raise them in as sterile an environment as we can. Meeting a
paucity of microorganisms, their immune systems never get a chance to become
robust and balanced. This is a particular problem today, as more women are
receiving cesarean sections to deliver their babies. The womb is an incredible
bug-shielding organ. As an embryo develops from two cells to a trillion, it can
safely do so in the womb’s sterile environment—without being turned into some
kind of monster by mom’s invading bugs. But to survive in this dirty world, a
newborn must very quickly develop its
immune system. That process begins as it descends the bacterial-laden birth
canal, and continues, as the baby sucks bacterial-laden mother’s milk and
inhales Uncle Charlie’s bacterial-laden breath.
But a baby born by C-section immediately pops from a sterile
womb into a germ infested world, with no preparation in the birth canal. We
aggravate the situation by spraying disinfectant on everything that baby
touches. Result: an out-of-balance immune system that goes haywire and either
allows otherwise harmless bacteria to beat it down or goes into overdrive and
attacks itself.
So the next time your doctor starts to write you out a
prescription for a course of antibiotics for some non-lethal infection, you
might think about declining. The next time you talk with an expectant mother,
you might caution her about the sterile danger of a C-section and encourage her
to breastfeed. If neither of these opportunities arises, express a little
gratitude for all the friendly foreign critters who make their abode inside
you. Your life literally depends on them!
[Note: Some of the information
that stimulated this posting is found in the
June 2012 issue of Scientific American.]
Friday, June 22, 2012
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
You Are Not You--Part 1
We are taught by our culture that we are each a unique,
separate, and independent individual. We think we are in charge of our mind and
body, that we alone determine how our being gets along. We see ourselves as an
organism that is assembled from a trillion cells that all have our unique
identity stamped on them; cells that make up organs and bone and nerves—every
one of them containing our exclusive DNA.
Not so. You are not who you think you are. You are not the
distinct “you” that you’ve believed all your life. Instead, you are a colony, a society of countless
individuals, a complex ecosystem of creatures that work together to form a vast
community. For every single one of your trillion cells that constitute your
body, there are ten bacterial cells inside you. These bacteria greatly
outnumber the total cellular composite that is you—and they are not just
visitors passing through, they live
in you! You permanently host a massive colony of beings. You are literally a
superorganism. You are not you.
Most of our bodily functions are regulated by these bacteria.
Another fable that we’ve accepted is that these bacteria are bad guys—they
cause disease and infection. True, some do, but the vast majority are
beneficial—in fact, they are essential to our health and welfare. Our digestive
system could not do its job without countless kinds of bacteria. They provide
nutrients and break down otherwise indigestible food. Our immune system would
go haywire without bacteria to regulate it and maintain its exquisite balance.
We would quickly expire without the help of all these microorganism critters.
We need them, far more than they need us.
Only recently has science discovered the role of bacteria in
our biome. (Biome: a large community of creatures occupying a significant
habitat—usually thought of as a forest or extensive ecosystem.) We have been
obsessed with the kinds of bacteria that cause disease. In centuries past,
disease was a mysterious malady whose origins were beyond humans. Then, in the
late 1800s, microscopes helped us to see these tiny critters and identify some
of them as the source of many illnesses of the day. Shortly thereafter,
penicillin and other antibiotics were discovered to have an ability to stop the
deadly bacteria and bring about miraculous cures. We fell in love with the
drugs that kill microorganisms.
We went to war—fighting many varieties of bacterial
infections and rendering humanity far healthier than in the past… or so we
believed. In our phobia with conquering bacterial infections, we went a little
too far. Today our medical professionals prescribe far too many antibiotics—to
the point that the rapidly-evolving “bad” bacteria are mutating into new
strains of superbugs that can slough off our most sophisticated antibiotics.
We’re literally breeding new kinds of super bugs! Our massive factory farms
that crowd together staggering numbers of poultry, pigs, cattle, and fish are
wonderful breeding grounds for bacteria, so we dose these critters with copious
amounts of antibiotics, hoping that they don’t succumb to disease. When we eat
these doped-up animals, we ingest their leftover antibiotics and help to keep
the microorganism arms race going in our bodies.
More on microbugs next time…
Thursday, June 14, 2012
A Potpourri of Nests--Part 2
Our local birds construct six different types of nests:
1. No
nest—the whippoorwill and turkey (see photo below).
2. Cup
nest (a coarse outer shell of twigs, lined with soft material)—the hummingbird,
crow, jay, Louisiana water thrush, wood thrush, and cardinal.
3. Mud
nest (an adobe-like base that is glued to some sturdy object)—the robin and
phoebe.
4. Tree
hole—the woodpecker; followed in subsequent years by smaller woodpecker, nuthatch,
titmouse, wren, and bluebird.
5. Second
hand (adapting a previously used nest)—the mourning dove.
6. In
or on manmade structures (including manmade nesting boxes)—the phoebe, Caroline
wren, robin, and bluebird.
For many of our birds, the key (as is true for human real
estate agents) is location, location, location. Their instincts and learned
skills drive their choice of location, but they have little way of knowing what
the future may bring. I’ve watched successful broods raised in what appeared to
me to be foolish and risky sites. I’ve also watched what seem to be
cleverly-located nests that get raided by snakes and other predators. In an
attempt to thwart predation, some small songbirds will even nest among raptors
for protection, in an attempt to ward off nest raids.
It required a few years of watching, before I understood the
nest-construction tricks of the Carolina wren—an especially cunning nest
builder. In the spring I have watched a wren hastily throw together some leaves
and twigs in an isolated corner (usually under the eaves of a structure I’ve
built), thinking I’m seeing its nest being fashioned. A day or two later, I see
no more activity, and wonder what happened. Certainly, a predator didn’t
already invade. Then I read that the male will construct several “dummy” nests,
after which he will escort his mate around to visit the various sites. She will
select the one that tickles her fancy and then finish it off. Such a scheme can
also confuse a predator, who may be duped into going after an empty nest.
The bird that impresses me most of all in its nest building,
however, is the phoebe. To begin with, it always builds under the eaves of our
house or an outbuilding, so its nest is rather obvious to us. Even though it’s
not a tame bird, the phoebe seems to be quite content to raise its broods right
above the doorway. Because their nest may be built against the rafters or under
sloping eaves, these can be precarious perches, so the nest must be solidly
fastened. They build a strong base of mud pellets, grass, moss, hair, feathers,
and phoebe poop—that is cemented in place.
I like to imagine the phoebe to be this deliberate,
accomplished carpenter, who carefully examines his selected foundation, and
then computes just the right mixture of ingredients, to withstand the rigors of
weather and the bouncing movements of family members. Sometimes during the
following winter, after the phoebes have flown to the warmth of Central
America, I will see a nest come loose and fall, but never during the brooding
season. What skill!
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Thursday, June 7, 2012
A Potpourri of Nests--Part 1
As I’ve gotten to know birds better over the years, I’ve come
to appreciate the wide variety of nests they build, but especially the artistry
that some of them exhibit in their construction process. I’m a slow learner, mostly
because bird nests are not easy to find—and that’s exactly what their aim is:
to build a child-raising lair that places their vulnerable offspring in a
well-disguised place. If nobody catches them in the act, that’s just dandy.
There are many bird enthusiasts who are far more accomplished
than I am at locating bird nests. Maybe I tend to respect their privacy a
little too much, since seldom have I located a nest in use. When fall arrives, however,
I am able to spot a few nests much more easily, after the trees have dropped
their leaves. Now and then, during the season, a nest will be blown down by a
storm and I can examine the fine handy work up close. It is a special treat,
and I always preserve the nest.
Some birds, such as the phoebe and the Carolina wren, prefer
to build under the cover of manmade structures, so their nests may be rather
obvious. And some, such as bluebirds and chickadees, are happy to move into
nesting boxes, so I can locate their nests and later examine them, after they
raise their babies. But most birds tend to be secretive about the location of
their nests.
Building a nest requires a variable amount of time and energy
investment—dependent on how elaborate they decide to go. Woodpeckers put in
many hours excavating holes in trees. Their type of nesting carpentry requires
a huge investment.
Nests, however, are not absolutely necessary for raising
young. Some species drop their eggs on the ground in an obscure location. The ancestors
of birds—the ferocious dinosaurs—laid their eggs directly on the ground. The
birds, descended from the dinosaurs, grew smaller and became more vulnerable.
They learned how to fly. That allowed them to look for more lofty perches for
their lodges.
The whippoorwill and turkey are local birds that still nests
directly on the ground. The whippoorwill can get away with it, because their
coloring is so cryptic that you could almost step on a brooding mom and not see
her. I say almost, because she will suddenly flush, just before your foot plops
down.
There is also a wide diversity in the way birds go about
selecting a nest site. Most nest building falls to the prospective mom. At the
least, it’s her choice as to location of the nest. She will spend some time,
when her first hormonal pangs set in, shopping around for a satisfactory home
site. There is also a learning curve that applies. Mom may not do all that well
with her first nest—either in its location or its robustness—but her next nest
will probably be better. That can be a reason why the offspring of some species
hang around to help mom and dad with subsequent broods: to learn some of the
finer points of nest building and baby raising. This is a fine example of
cultural learning, as opposed to instinctive actions.
More on nests next time…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


