But
I don't see the science-versus-mystery game as a dualistic, exclusive
choice that I must make. If I go for science's story and facts, I
don't necessarily have to abandon mystery and wonder. If I want to
retain some mystery about the situation, I don't have to ignore what
science can tell me about it.
To
begin with, science is rarely certain. This is a mistake
people often make. (Or worse yet, people reject science's story,
because it isn't certain. Hey, it's only a theory,
right? So let's reject the Theory of Evolution. Let's reject the
theory of global warming. Our culture is inclined, out of naivety, to
spurn science.) Scientists are clear that their theories are never
the last word. They never reach certainty on much of
anything—instead, it's at best a provisional understanding. Further
study will uncover new data and information, so a revised
understanding will emerge... a little closer to the truth, but never
exactly spot on. The only certainty in the human realm occurs with
dogma—either from religious sources or from people who consider
themselves to be an unmitigated authority.
Thus,
while I perceive science as not offering me anything certain and
final, I nonetheless very often turn to it, when I encounter
something in nature that I don't understand; something that is
mysterious. My experience has been that once I do delve into
science in order to learn what's going on, the knowledge I gain
inevitably leads me to deeper wonderings; to more mystery.
For
example, if I were to go seek what science has to say about how
Young's wasp builds its nest—once that question is answered—I am
confident that I would find a host of additional questions popping
out. What's more, these questions would never have come to me,
without that additional knowledge that science brought me. For
example, How did evolution bring about this process? Why does the
wasp use the specific materials that it does? Why has it chosen that
particular location to build its nest—to avoid predators; to be
closer to prey? Do wasps over in the next state use the same
construction process, and why? Hmm, now that I know more about its
nest—and maybe the fact this species of wasp rarely stings—let me
get my magnifying glass and close in for a better view. What details
am I now missing, that I'd then see?
So
I don't see mystery and certainty as being at odds with each
other—forcing me to choose one and lose the other. Science does not
close me down, or erase the wonder. Think of Carl Sagan (those of you
who might remember his “Cosmos” series on TV in the early 80s).
He was an eminent scientist who described the universe with poetic
awe. That's no certainty; it's flat out wonder and reverence.