"I'm top dog around here."
Monday, October 28, 2013
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Squirrel Squabbles
Squirrels
scamper everywhere through our woods—usually silently. On occasion, one will
scold the cat or the dog—as it hangs upside down from a branch or tree trunk,
tail twitching, chattering away noisily, chastising its enemy, its eyes glued
on its target. Squirrels may even bombard us human ground-bound critters with
acorns—demonstrating their disdain for us.
One recent
evening while reposing in the outdoor tub, I heard a squirrel-like chattering,
a short distance into the woods. It did not sound like their usual scolding or
babbling, but more like a warning or a threatening noise—a deeper, growl-like
sound. It continued for several seconds, as my eyes scanned the trees, trying
to locate the source of the ruckus.
Finally I
spotted two squirrels up on a tree branch, nearly nose to nose—as if in a macho
face-off. The lower squirrel had its back to a nest and it seemed to be the
noisemaker. The higher squirrel suddenly turned and retreated up the limb, as the
lower one then returned to the nest. The upper squirrel quickly returned, came
within a foot or so of the nest, made an in-your-face chipping sound, and
quickly withdrew back up the limb. It leapt to another tree and disappeared to
safety—having bravely delivered its parting shot.
What was
happening? A fight for the nest? Some kind of territorial battle? A parent
booting its offspring out of the nest? A sexual jousting? I will probably never
know. Quiet returned to the area, as I sank back into the hot healing waters.
Saturday, October 19, 2013
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Amiable Earth
There is a sad
irony about what is recently happening to planet Earth. For most of the time
that our planet has existed (some 4 ½ billion years), the environment was too
harsh for humans to thrive—let alone even survive. Earth has gone through
extremely hot or cold periods, has had an atmosphere that was poisonous to us,
was once dominated by monstrous critters who would have easily gobbled us up,
or was subject to natural disasters such as meteorite or asteroid collisions,
earthquakes, or horrendous volcanic blasts.
In the last
million years or so the planet has gone through numerous alternating glacial
and torrid periods. Finally, in just the last 10,000 years—since humans have
settled into a sedentary lifestyle—Earth has calmed down and become a very
gentle and benevolent place; much like a Garden of Eden. For our entire written
history, that congenial ambience is all we have known. We have had no exposure
to the harsh conditions that prevailed for most of Earth’s past. We have been
spoiled.
The sad irony
is that we humans seem hell-bent on destroying this amiable Earth—and the
tragedy is that we are either in denial about it or blissfully ignorant of the
extent of our damage. During this last 10,000 year period—just as Earth was
becoming congenial—we became the top predator and, in doing so, came into
possession of an unimaginable amount of power. Rather than wisely use that
power to nurture our planet, we have been foolish; fouling our beautiful nest.
In the wink of a geological eye, Earth is turning uncongenial—and this time we are the cause.
The even sadder
situation is that we blindly continue our foolishness as conditions worsen. We
are playing with a type of fire that is far more powerful than we are. Our
shortsightedness and disinterest in the larger reality of our world keep us
numb to the consequences.
There is no
question that we are steering this beautiful planet into grim times. No one can
predict what the future will bring. Conjectures span the range from little
change at all (believing that our undeserved comfortableness will somehow
continue indefinitely) to the end of the world approaching. I believe that the
latter guess is overly extreme. Planet Earth has weathered unimaginably tough
conditions in the past—far nastier than we humans could ever bring about. Gaia
will survive the next harsh period, and we humans also likely will. Our habitat,
however, will become far more unpleasant than we’ve ever experienced. It’s not
going to be fun.
What’s sad is
that it needn’t be this way. We needn’t have been so irresponsible.
Labels:
climate change,
environmental damage,
Gaia's future
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Virginia Little Brown Bat
We are farm sitting on friends' sheep farm in the Allegheny Mountains this week. Upon arriving, we were greeted by a little brown bat clinging to the kitchen curtains. I carefully removed him and took him outside. His thanks was to bare his teeth at me. Cute, eh? (Click to enlarge.)
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Don't Fence Me In
A never-ending
menace to gardening is the plethora of feral free-loaders who wait in the wings
to invade and behave as if it is their royal right to consume your hard-fought
edibles for themselves. Everything and anything from insects (far too many
varieties to even attempt to enumerate) to rabbits to deer to voles to fungi to
nematodes to bacteria, have competed with us for vegetable harvests. It can be
a frustrating experience dealing with all these thieves.
I've written
before on this blog about how we try to live with these many menaces, without
going toxic and poisoning them (and ourselves a little, to boot). There's a
certain degree of vegetable damage that we've learned to accept—sort of like a
tax grudgingly paid to the government. There are also many nonviolent methods a
gardener can use, to discourage purloiners or to lessen their damage. A
gardener can never let down the guard, however, as some of these critters can
quickly multiply and overwhelm you.
Of the
larger-size thieves, deer have blessedly been one of our minor problems. Unlike
our neighbors, we've not had to install tall fences, or electric shock
mechanisms, or implement other major defenses. I believe that our free-roaming
dogs who love to chase deer are our biggest deterrent. Luckily we live in a
very rural location in which our dogs can roam without infringing on neighbors.
Now and then an
invader gets the upper hand, however, and we struggle to control the damage.
This year the beets and Swiss chard—just as they were at a succulent two-inch
height—got nipped off at soil level by some critter bigger than a beetle, yet was
too small to leave behind telltale tracks. Rabbit? Chipmunk? Weasel? Couldn't
be voles—they sneak in from underground and drag the plant down into their
subterranean lair, to chow down at their leisure. We lost our first round of
chard and beet plantings to the mystery thief.
Later on, while
picking beans, my wife discovered the identity of our invader. And what an
audacious little critter! Hunkered down in the bean patch mulch was a rabbit's
nest, from which momma and three babies made a dash for safety! Attracted by
the uproar, our dog went on the chase. He caught one baby, and we flinched at
its squeals, feeling bad about its death, while at the same time recognizing
that the dog was just following nature's urge. We'd rather repel critters than
kill them, but when they cross a certain line, more drastic measures may be in
order.
We soon retired
for the night, leaving the dog on night patrol around the garden, hoping that
what remained of the rabbit family was still heading over the far ridge. (My
major ire was directed at our cat, who is supposed to take on night patrol
duties, fending off rabbits and their rodent cousins. What's he been doing all
night—dancing to the light of the moon?)
Just after dawn
the next morning, we heard occasional canine yips coming from the direction of
the garden. Was the dog fending off a threatened return of the rabbits? Was he
celebrating another catch? His insistent yipping drew me from my cozy bed.
Shuffling through the morning dew toward the garden, I saw him trapped inside
the garden fence. He’d been calling to us (all night!) to free him.
How had he
managed to trap himself inside, with the gate closed, when we were sure he was
outside? Did the rabbits push the gate shut behind him, and then from outside,
tease him? Had he gotten so excited about catching more rabbits that he managed
to leap the fence to get at the nest? I could find no other place of entry and
I doubt that he managed to latch the gate behind himself. How many times I have
wished he could speak English and explain himself... he'd have another
hilarious story to tell!
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Saturday, October 5, 2013
Three-Second Present
I began meditating many years ago. I am fortunate to have
a Buddhist monastery/retreat center nearby, where I have been able to acquire a
solid training in meditation techniques. It has brought a major and positive
change to my life. At the core of Buddhist meditation is the concept of mindfulness: living fully in the present
moment.
The present moment is all that we have that is real. The
past is gone and the future has yet to be realized. Just because we humans,
with our higher cognitive abilities, know
that there is a past and a future, doesn’t mean that we can reach out and touch
them. Animals, in contrast, are always able to live in the present moment,
because they don’t have the higher mental powers to conceive of either a past
or future.
It is through our ability to place full attention to the
moment-to-moment passing of life that we can live it to the fullest (as animals do). We so
easily miss much of life by going into our heads and either dwelling on what
once happened or anticipating what may be. We become embroiled in emotions
of regret about having missed certain opportunities or try to relive past times
of victory. We worry about coming events—investing psychic energy into playing
out threatening or exciting scenarios that may never happen. In the meantime,
we’re losing out on what’s happening right
now—the only reality that we have access to.
When we are able to avoid being sucked off into the
inaccessible past or future, we can fully participate in the now. We become mindful of what’s
happening in the present moment and find ourselves not missing opportunities
that manifest themselves and thus making wiser choices on how to live. The present
moment is also very personal—it’s our own experience.
Many meditators view the present moment as an
instantaneous window in time, during which one attempts to be aware of every
split second that exists—fully engaging with it. That work is extremely hard to
do. No matter how diligently you try to be fully aware of each moment in time,
your mind will repeatedly follow some event into the past, or be dragged into
the future, or take off on flight around the world. I spend most of my
meditation time being reminded that I’ve once again drifted off from the now
and patiently returning my mind to the present moment. A second or so later, my
mind is once again off to distant temporal realms.
It can become rather frustrating. I believe that the
practice is valuable, however, if only to demonstrate to us how uncontrollable
the mind is, and to periodically experience the exhilaration of “now,” or
occasionally remaining mindful for a few minutes. It is very liberating. An additional
reward comes when you arise from your meditation pillow and resume your normal
activities: you’re just a little more aware of the value of paying attention to
what is going on and engaging life as it unfolds.
I recently read about some current neurological research
on how our brain perceives time. Our personal apprehension of time is referred
to as “biological” or “psychological” time. It’s different from physical time,
which is an objective entity, something that can be measured by instruments.
Our brain continually receives signals from our various senses, and then it
constructs our view of reality from those inputs. Neurologists have wondered:
How does the brain distinguish between past and future stimuli? Where does the
mind draw the line between past, present, and future?
This research suggests that our temporal reality is not
based on the instantaneous now, but
interprets events as being on the order of three seconds long; in other words,
reality comes in three-second chunks. It seems that our gray matter integrates
over a three-second period and creates a subjective response for that interval
of time. In other words, the subjective “present” for us is not an instant, but
a three-second-long temporal window. Our mind will see “one thing” for three
seconds and then shift to another equal span of time.
These findings have cast a little different light on
meditation for me. I’m now not trying to adhere to that elusive instantaneous
moment, attempting to surf the crest of a temporal wave and repeatedly “wiping
out.” It’s not so precise as that. Maybe
I can cut myself a little slack, knowing that, at best my attention is smeared
out over a three-second interval. Maybe I can be more successful in staying
within that interval, than trying to be ever present with each passing instant.
Maybe I can ride the wave all the way through to the beach.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)