What you're looking at is Harry after being scooped from the tub. That background mesh is a kitchen sieve. Harry is about 6-8 inches long. Click to enlarge.
Friday, November 30, 2012
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Horsehair Harry—Part 1
I recently met Harry the horsehair worm, the morning after a
hot tub. I had never known such a creature existed, until I saw him squirming
about at the bottom of the tub, as I began to drain it. I took a photo of
him—later to investigate and discover what he was. Here’s some of what I found.
A horsehair worm is related to the nematode—a type of
parasitic worm. It is extremely thin (about 1/16 inch) and several inches long…
up to as much as a foot long. They writhe about, twisting themselves into a
tangled blob that looks like a knotted cord. In fact, a common name for them is
Gordian worm. An ancient myth has the worm spontaneously come alive from a
horse’s tail hair—hence the name. In the fall they are usually found in pools
of water (say, a horse drinking trough, in the old days), where they hunker down over the winter.
In the spring the horsehair worms get nasty. I last wrote
about how we humans sometimes tend to romance nature. Here’s an example where
nature gets pretty violent and ugly.
A group of worms will coil and knot themselves into orgiastic
clumps, wherein the females become inseminated. Each mom then lays about a million eggs that soon hatch and yield
larvae—100 of them lined up end-to-end would hardly extend an inch. Biologists
are not sure how, but the surviving larvae soon find their way into the gut of
an insect—such as a cricket or a katydid, where they begin their odious
parasitic life.
They first chew their way through the insect’s stomach wall
and take up residence for a few weeks to a few months in the insect’s body
cavity. The larvae have no food processing system—no stomach, no intestine, no
anus. They have no circulatory or respiratory system either. They simply soak
up nutrients from the interior of their hosts—absorbing food through their skin
as they slowly destroy the host.
The larva molts several times and eventually grows into an
adult worm—tightly coiled inside the insect’s body. It exudes a chemical that
goes to the cricket’s brain—causing it to seek water and then drown itself,
whereupon the worm breaks out and goes its way, leaving behind a hollowed-out,
dead cricket.
It is now called a free-living worm, because it no longer
lives the life of a parasite—when it was fully dependent for its existence on a
host. Each mature worm lives through the winter (free at last!), never eating
or excreting, just living on stored fat.
More on Harry next time…
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Romancing Nature—Part 2
Real nature can be scary—rather than cute and cuddly. To our
deep ancestors, nature was an awesome place that called for a healthy level of
fear—not what is imagined as the “Peaceable Kingdom,” where the lion reposes
compliantly with the lamb. Our ancestors understood nature in its “red in tooth
and claw” quality. In our attempts to enforce our dominion over the world, we
have domesticated it and largely eradicated our fear and awe.
Thus we have people wandering through the wilderness, coming
upon a grizzly bear and trying to get close for a photograph. So we read in the
news about another person killed by a bear, and wonder if something should be
done about it. Many people are unaware of the various kinds of parasites who
invade a critter and slowly and painfully kill their host. This is not the kind
of nature we want to hear about.
We have done our best to terminate what we perceive to be
animal-to-animal cruelty in nature, while at the same time overlooking our
cruelty toward it and each other. We have interfered with God’s sacred world
and imposed our misplaced values on it.
If, on the other hand, we were to open ourselves to the
reality of nature, we could not only see its beauty, but also what’s not cozy out there: the scary predators,
the violent deaths, the scavengers who feast on dead bodies, the nasty parasites,
etc. We could learn to accept these unpleasant realities, along with the
enchanting antics of birds, chipmunks, and other cute critters. When we come to
understand that we are a part of the natural world and that it’s a world
containing both peace and killing, we can see the wholeness and realize that
nature is sacred and beautiful in its own right. We don’t need to romance or
idealize it. We don’t need to force it to conform to some fictitious and gentle
image that we’ve created.
Our ancestors were in close touch with real nature. They
dealt with threatening predators, as they simultaneously felt a sense of peace
and awe. It was not a nature stripped of its threats, or of their immediacy and
deep connection to it. We can reacquire our ancestors’ awe of nature, as well
as thrill to its beauty and serenity. We can learn to appreciate its
wholeness—by getting back in touch with it, by dropping our idealized picture
and opening to the complete story. It’s both tame and wild.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Injured Nuthatch
This white-breasted nuthatch flew into the window and stunned himself. He can't close his beak. I held him, hoping he'd recover. A bird in the hand is worth two....
Click to enlarge.
Click to enlarge.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Romancing Nature—Part 1
Many people in modern society have developed a quixotic view
of nature—a perspective that is both idealistic and unrealistic, because it
views nature primarily as a nurturing, gentle, and innocent realm. While that
can certainly be true, it’s a very limited understanding. It’s also a kind of quasi-religious
or new-agey belief that can allow people to interpret nature from a secure distance,
as a cuddly place of sanctuary and safety.
This perspective interestingly seems to bubble up most often in
those people who regret our modern disconnect from the natural world and who
lament the preponderance of society’s soulless, mechanical perspective. Yet
these same individuals continue to hang onto a belief in a type of outdated spirituality
that has placed us apart from and superior to all other creatures—a belief that
has significantly contributed to that disconnect. It’s a viewpoint that can create
a false understanding of the natural world and our place in it.
We in America have a long tradition of enjoying fine nature writers
such as Thoreau, Emerson, John Muir, and Wordsworth, who compellingly described
the sacredness of the wild. Their words have drawn many of us closer to nature
than our urban-technological society would otherwise allow. We feel the tug of
their depictions of the natural world—exacerbated by the separation that many
of us have from nature and our minimal ability to experience it directly.
But this romantic perception of nature, while comforting, can
blind us to seeing the reality of the world that is outside the influence of
humans: a wild and raw nature. We have distanced ourselves from this true
nature, so we have come to romanticizing it. We lack a tangible connection to
nature and have, in the vacuum, created an imaginary connection. It is a fanciful
perception that is exemplified in Disney’s cute, animated movies.
The unfortunate truth is that the only nature most of us can experience
today is a human-altered nature, in which we have eliminated most of the large,
predatory mammals from the wild. In so doing, we have created a subdued nature.
The British Isles, for example, were once home to numerous large predators and
were covered by primeval forests. One can walk the length of Britain today and
never fear an attack from a threatening critter, while enjoying the fabulous gardens
carefully cultivated by their accomplished horticulturists.
We have removed the majority of those large predators—the
denizens of the top of the food chain—without understanding their evolutionary
role in the ecological balance. We have impoverished nature, while simultaneously
remaining blind to our role in the depleted natural scene. We put attention to
isolated problems in the natural world—how to deal with the plethora of deer in
suburban neighborhoods, for example—ignorant of what has really been lost or
unbalanced in nature by our actions. We have tamed nature and subsequently have
transformed it into a place of comfort. What we see is not real nature.
More romance next time…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)