Sunday, December 25, 2011
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Reincarnating the Pond--Part 2
It dawned on me that my actions had now made me the main
person responsible for the caretaking of the pond. I had brought about the
refill and the critters seemed to enjoy it, but what had I started? Pretty soon
the pond began to look a little scummy from algae growth. Weren’t there fish in
it before it drained? Don’t fish maybe eat algae and keep the water clear?
After heavy rains, the pond water—now no longer having access
to a drainpipe—would threaten to crest the dam. Oh-oh, was this leading to the
possible failure of the dam embankment, allowing a tsunami to sweep down the
holler towards our house? Had I opened Pandora’s Pond?
Luckily, I have a buddy who previously worked for Uncle Sam’s
soil conservation service, who once made a living by advising farmers how to
build a dam to store water and control flooding. I asked Roger to come by and
give me his professional advice on whether or not I’d dived in over my head.
After the obligatory period of pulling my chain a couple of times, he got
serious and told me, “That’s a damn strong dam… not to worry.” That advice
helped enormously!
I also consulted him on the spreading algae scum. His advice
was to get some koi, release them into the pond, and they’d be happy to keep it
clean. He had a similar pond next to his house that he’d stocked with koi, and
he enjoyed watching them swim in the clear water. Koi is the Japanese word for carp—a large ornamental fish that is
bright orange, with white and black splotches. I called the local pet store; to
find out that koi were quite pricey. I hesitated at running an experiment of
tossing $30 worth of fancy foreign fish into the pond, only to watch them die
off.
Then it occurred to me that goldfish are also a type of
carp—and they cost only 25 cents apiece, rather than $3-4. I bought a dozen
one-inch long goldfish and released them into what I fervently hoped would
become their happy home. The next season, pausing by the pond one day, I peered
into the water and cheered when I spotted a small school of goldfish—now a
couple of inches long! Over the next year or so the algae disappeared and I
watched the goldfish grow into sizeable carp—some approaching a foot long!
Victory is often short lived, it seems. Over the last couple
of years, I have seen no goldfish. Many a time I’ve stood at pondside, gazing
hopefully into the depths, but have seen no slinky golden forms. Were they
still down there, but playing koi (err… coy)? Did something eat them? They had
no way of knowing that their flashy gold color stood starkly out and that hawks
might decide to dine on them. Would the pond now algae over again? What had I
gotten myself into?
It seems that I have become involved with yet another ongoing
experiment with Mother Nature. I have interfered and started something. Every
move we make, we enter into some kind of dance with the natural world, in which
we disturb the balance of the environment, and cause ripples that flow outward.
We have minimal understanding of the complexity and entanglement of nature’s
worldwide web. If we try to make our actions benign and do them with care, our
disturbances may be harmless, or even helpful. If our actions are harsh and
careless, we can do lasting damage. It behooves us to step cautiously… we’re
meddling with the sacred.
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Monday, December 12, 2011
Reincarnating the Pond--Part 1
Surrounding our lovely 30 acres of forested land is some 500
acres, possessed either by absentee owners or by aging folks who stay at home.
It’s a blessing, because, not only do we have no close neighbors, but also we
have all that land we can wander through. On an adjacent 40-acre parcel is a lovely
little pond that was created by the owners building a dam across a holler,
years before we settled here.
One of my regular paths through the woods wanders by that
pond—where I love to pause and observe the wildlife that draws sustenance from
the water: amphibians, birds, deer, raccoons, insects, and myriad other
critters I’ve yet to spot. The pond is a beautiful mini ecosystem that provides
important habitat for all these creatures. In the winter, I can ice skate on
its frozen surface and in warmer times, I enjoy tossing sticks in the water for
the dogs to chase.
We also very much appreciate the dam holding back runoff from
the holler. We are downstream from it all and the pond stores a lot of water in
the wake of summer downpours, rather than let it roar threateningly by us.
Some 15 years ago, the overflow drainpipe for the pond rusted
and broke off. This pipe was originally installed to allow extra water to drain
from the pond, rather than let it build up to a level that might top the dam.
With the pipe broken, the pond quickly drained dry—stealing its nourishing
waters from all the wildlife. For the next few years, I continued to visit the
(now dry) pond, lamenting its loss. The owner lives somewhere out near the West
Coast and rarely visits his little Shenandoah Valley acreage. I have no way to
contact him and I guessed that he was not only unaware of the empty pond, but
most likely would be reluctant to pay for its repair, if he did know.
After a couple of years of hiking past the pondless pond and
longing for the good old days when it teemed with life, I secretly laid plans
to raise the pond, phoenix like, from the dry dust of the empty hole it had
become. The broken drainpipe that lay beneath the dam had to be stoppered. It
seemed to me that if I plugged the upper end of that pipe, maybe the pond would
rise again!
Laboriously, I carried several buckets of cement and water
overland, mixed them with some rocks from the dry pond bottom, and corked the
end of the pipe. I committed my clandestine act in broad daylight, glancing
guiltily over my shoulder more than once. Did I have any right to take this
action?
Skulking back home, I turned the project over to Mother
Nature. Sure enough, over the next year or so, the pond slowly refilled and
then I delighted when once again I heard frogs and saw newts swimming along.
The dragonflies returned and I occasionally saw deer hoof prints at pondside.
It felt great to see all the wildlife return, even though my conscience
occasionally gnawed at me. How would the owner respond to my reincarnation
work? Would he even know (especially if I kept my dirty little secret)?
Continued next time…
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Hunt'n Seaz'n
My partner and I are in the midst of our 27th
deer-hunting season out here in the Valley. I don’t own a gun and do not hunt.
In our first few years out here, my misgivings about guns (all the harm they
create in urban environments) and my disinclination to hunt (killing an animal
with a gun seems to be beyond my capability) caused the yearly arrival of hunt’n
seaz’n to be something we dreaded. We were startled by the blasts of rifles
resounding from the woods and were quite intimidated by the sight of macho
dudes patrolling the back roads in their large, gun-racked pickup trucks,
looking to spot deer.
Thankfully, we have found that our anxiety about the season
has gradually dissipated over the years—for several reasons I’ll go into below.
I still have no interest in hunting or owning a gun, but we wince much less now
when a rifle goes off and worry far less about a stray bullet coming our way.
Part of our being more at ease is some kind of “proof of the pudding”: we’ve
had no close calls over the years. (However, as soon as I write these words I
recall the teenage son of a visiting hunter who once accidently discharged his
loaded rifle in our driveway, just a few feet from me. Would that be considered
a close call? Closer than I cared for.)
As we have gotten used to the hunt, and have come to know
neighbors who are serious hunters, we’ve relaxed quite a bit. We know these
folks respect the land and its critters. They have lived close to the land all
their lives, and have their diets importantly supplemented with venison,
turkey, squirrel, raccoon, woodchuck, and other wild creatures. We still would
rather not have armed people wandering through the woods around us, but
recognize that the knowledgeable hunters are the primary thing that controls the
burgeoning deer population (unless you want to count the automobile).
Yet we remain cautious, while no longer fearful. We stay out
of the woods on Saturdays, when the number of hunters soars. We wear blaze
orange when we stray beyond our immediate clearing. We also remain concerned
about our dogs, since we allow them the freedom to run; we’ve never tied or
penned them. We highly value their patrols that have so far kept deer from the
garden (unlike many of our neighbors, who have had their veggies repeatedly
decimated). The dogs do not roam the woods—they stay pretty close to home—but
they might look a little too much like a deer to the careless hunter.
Over time, I have come to understand that not all deer hunters are to be feared, and,
in fact now am able to discern three types of hunters that come round:
1. The
local, experienced folks, who hunt for food: They are careful, plan their
shots, and hunt in sensible places at sensible times of day. They call us to
ask permission to walk our land and let us know when they will be out there.
We’ve come to appreciate their skills, the need for them to keep the deer
population in check, and the fact that their presence discourages that of the
other two (less desirable) types of hunters.
2. The
lazy, local hunter: He drives the back roads and is not at all averse to
shooting from the window of his truck. He knows these remote backwoods and the
fact that the game warden is unlikely to intercept him. He tosses his beer cans
and other trash along the road. When he bags a deer, he rarely butchers it, but
is more likely to cut off a tasty shoulder and dump the rest of the remains
along the road.
3. The
city boy: He heads for the hills with a few buddies, for the thrill of firing
their guns at most anything that moves, sometimes after downing a few beers. He
knows someone who has a piece of land on which he can hunt, but often lacks a
sense of where the boundaries to that land lie. He roams the woods, unfamiliar
with the proximity of houses. He tends to reveal his presence at dusk, when the
light level falls, but has not yet bagged his deer. How? He has come all the
way out here to shoot, dammit, and shoot he will. We wince at all the repeated
rifle discharges, as daylight fades, knowing they really can’t see any prey.
In our first few years out here we worried about encountering
the second two types of hunter. Fortunately, our overwhelming experiences have
been with the first type—the local guys who really need the food and respect
Mother Nature.
Our dogs, however, feel quite differently about deer-hunting
season than we do. They may cower a bit when a nearby rifle blasts off, but
they relish the feast of deer parts that get scattered through the woods after
the hunters leave. They love legs and innards. They’d much prefer to gnaw on a weeks’-old,
moldering deer part than eat the dry dog food that comes from a bag the rest of
the year.
Just when we were beginning to relax a little during hunt’n
seaz’n, the state extended it a few years back, from a couple of weeks in late
November to six weeks that end in early January. Now we must be wary for much
longer and curtail our walks in the woods for much longer. Oh well… life can
get boring when it becomes too comfortable.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Long Recovery
Life forms on planet Earth have experienced some half dozen
mass extinctions in the last 500 million years or so, during which up to 95% of
species disappeared. Prior to each extinction event, the mixture of species had
slowly settled into a stable balance, wherein each life form had found a niche
that saw it interacting in cooperative ways with surrounding species—in ways
that tended to perpetuate the blend. Evolution had slowed to a crawl, because
the environment had stabilized and life forms had little reason to change.
Then some huge environmental upheaval occurred. An asteroid
or comet crashed down, many large volcanoes erupted, noxious gases were burped
up from the bowels of the seas, or the climate dramatically warmed or chilled. Many
of those species that had been enjoying a long-term stable equilibrium suddenly
found themselves with life’s comfortable rug yanked abruptly from under them. They
had become a little too relaxed and vulnerable in their comfortable world. They
couldn’t cope with the new harsh conditions and soon became extinct. Other species—some
of whom had previously been scrambling for survival on the edges—found
themselves better able to cope with the new environment. They adapted, survived,
and thrived.
In the eons following each mass extinction, life on Earth
slowly settled into a new mix of species. In fact, novel varieties of life came
into existence in this aftermath, as evolution entered the fast track. Over
time, life once again entered a stable period… until the next environmental
catastrophe.
And the next mass extinction is currently underway. What is
unique about this one is that it is not being triggered by a comet, asteroid,
or volcano, but by one of Earth’s own life forms: Homo sapiens. This new dying off—designated the Holocene extinction—is
being driven by human overabundance and overconsumption. We are now the force altering the biosphere.
Earth is still in the early throes of the Holocene
extinction. Where it will lead and how many species will disappear is anybody’s
guess. Society seems to be unable yet even to wake up and admit it is
happening, so we continue to aggravate the process.
What humans understand even less is the rate at which these changes are occurring. To Mother Earth, this is
the fastest mass extinction ever to transpire. While previous extinctions took
thousands of years to pass, this one is speeding by increasingly faster—spanning
just a few hundred years. To Homo sapiens
that’s a fair passage of time. To the 3-4 billion year period of life on Earth,
however, it’s an instant.
What we understand even less yet is that the recovery from the Holocene extinction will seem
endless to us. In the aftermath of previous extinctions, life required
millions—even tens of millions—of years recover. In contrast, we humans have
been around just a few hundred thousand years. No one can begin to imagine what
continued evolution will bring to Homo
sapiens in a million years’ time. Once the recovery is over, it’ll be a
very different planet. I wonder what the dominant species will be like then.
Hopefully, one that’s smarter than humans today.
Saturday, November 12, 2011
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Terminable Time
Our human ability to project into the future far better than
most critters is both a boon and a burden; the difficulty is that we know that
someday we will die. Even though we seldom are inclined to acknowledge it,
every one of us is conscious of this fact. Our time in this existence is
restricted… one might even say very short. Compared to a tree, we’re here
quickly and then gone. Compared to a mountain, we’re not even the blink of an
eye.
Animals are less likely to suffer from the curse of knowing
they have only so much time, so they happily and blissfully live in the moment,
not worrying about it. We humans have certain advantages over our fellow
creatures (say, sipping a nice cabernet wine) but our curse, the source of so
much of our angst, is the foreknowledge that we will soon be gone. So there’s a
deep understanding at the core of every human that time is precious, more so
than gold, although this is seldom a conscious response.
Many of us try to use our limited time by obsessively filling
every waking moment with furious activity. Modern technology allows us to
accomplish a particular feat that required a dozen of our ancestors. So we
multitask! A contemporary farmer on his own can tend to hundreds of acres with
his machines, which enables him to plow while he texts! The business world
esteems productivity and strives to drive efficiency ever higher—drawing evermore
lifeblood out of employees.
Many of us understand that money and time are, in some ways, interchangeable.
For example, I noted years ago that, having chosen to live a low-income lifestyle, I
had to invest a lot more time in daily chores. Many people earn lots of money
in order to be able to buy the time of others to do their mundane tasks, while
they carve out time to ski or go sailing. Leisure time can be very pricey!
We thus are likely to adopt the belief that the more money we
have, the more time we’ll have. That’s a false lure, however. Yes, there seems
to be virtually no limit to the amount of money one may accumulate, but that’s
where the addictive draw of material things comes in. When is enough, enough?
Our insatiable desires can never be slaked. But if we pause and honestly look
at ourselves, we can quickly see that, although time and money seem interchangeable, there is a limit to the amount of time we
have. We may become a billionaire, but can’t become immortal.
Thus, many people ironically and paradoxically (even
tragically) allow precious time to be wasted, even when they are fervently
trying to hoard it. While their attention is diverted by making more money,
their time slips away. Another irony of the human condition is that poor people
often have more time than the rich—if only because they can devote more
attention to it. More often than not, a poor person is more generous with her
time than a wealthy one.
One of the salient paradoxes of the human condition is that,
like love, we can enjoy our time so much more when we give it away. Both time
and love are priceless, and yet when we freely mete them out to others, we
discover that we can come to appreciate them more than we ever would if we try
to hoard them. It’s not that we find others returning love or time to us in
abundance (although this can happen); it’s that we really come to appreciate
every moment and every gesture of love that we share. It’s a sacred
contradiction: to get something truly precious, you must give it away.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)